<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Johnny Rich	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://johnnyrich.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://johnnyrich.com/</link>
	<description>Education &#124; Employability &#124; Policy &#124; Comms Consultant &#124; Writer &#124; Speaker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:10:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Fairer Funding coverage by What should party manifestos say about higher education funding? - Johnny Rich		</title>
		<link>https://johnnyrich.com/fairer-funding-coverage/#comment-1404</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What should party manifestos say about higher education funding? - Johnny Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyrich.com/?p=647#comment-1404</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] was delighted that my Fairer Funding proposal for an Employer Levy has been economically modelled &#038; polled in Higher Education [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] was delighted that my Fairer Funding proposal for an Employer Levy has been economically modelled &amp; polled in Higher Education [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Signs and wonders: Better CEIAG by whoiscall		</title>
		<link>https://johnnyrich.com/signs-and-wonders-better-ceiag/#comment-1391</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whoiscall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2023 22:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johnnyrich.com/?p=1099#comment-1391</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Vocational qualifications: don&#8217;t turn off the tap to make T by T Levels: what&#8217;s the win for employers? &#8211; Johnny Rich		</title>
		<link>https://johnnyrich.com/vocational-qualifications-dont-turn-off-the-tap-to-make-t/#comment-1389</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T Levels: what&#8217;s the win for employers? &#8211; Johnny Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 15:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johnnyrich.com/?p=988#comment-1389</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] especially to overcome the real challenges of delivering T levels at scale at a regional level – the Government&#8217;s approach appears to be to defund other options, even when its own targets for T level expansion won&#8217;t replace what&#8217;s being [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] especially to overcome the real challenges of delivering T levels at scale at a regional level – the Government&#8217;s approach appears to be to defund other options, even when its own targets for T level expansion won&#8217;t replace what&#8217;s being [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Why do we undervalue careers advisers? by Signs and wonders: Better CEIAG &#8211; Johnny Rich		</title>
		<link>https://johnnyrich.com/why-do-we-undervalue-careers-advisers/#comment-1387</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Signs and wonders: Better CEIAG &#8211; Johnny Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johnnyrich.com/?p=1019#comment-1387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] to do with a defensiveness against the kind of dismissive attitude that they often face and which I&#8217;ve written about before. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to do with a defensiveness against the kind of dismissive attitude that they often face and which I&#8217;ve written about before. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The lifelong learning buffet needs nutritional oversight by Johnny Rich		</title>
		<link>https://johnnyrich.com/the-lifelong-learning-buffet-needs-nutritional-oversight/#comment-1385</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johnnyrich.com/?p=1071#comment-1385</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://johnnyrich.com/the-lifelong-learning-buffet-needs-nutritional-oversight/#comment-1384&quot;&gt;Mike Ratcliffe&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, Mike. I agree entirely that forging the rules will be a tough job. The question will be whether it can be done within the timeframe of the political opportunity. 
It may end up falling into the category of policies that are good ideas, but just too complicated to deliver within the lifetime of any government (let alone a minister). 
Given that I&#039;m astonished (and impressed) that the Treasury let DfE make promises to fund billions of pounds of  loans that will never be repaid in full (at the same time as arguing over a greater claw-back of student loans), the political road for LLE may be very rocky.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://johnnyrich.com/the-lifelong-learning-buffet-needs-nutritional-oversight/#comment-1384">Mike Ratcliffe</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, Mike. I agree entirely that forging the rules will be a tough job. The question will be whether it can be done within the timeframe of the political opportunity.<br />
It may end up falling into the category of policies that are good ideas, but just too complicated to deliver within the lifetime of any government (let alone a minister).<br />
Given that I&#8217;m astonished (and impressed) that the Treasury let DfE make promises to fund billions of pounds of  loans that will never be repaid in full (at the same time as arguing over a greater claw-back of student loans), the political road for LLE may be very rocky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on The lifelong learning buffet needs nutritional oversight by Mike Ratcliffe		</title>
		<link>https://johnnyrich.com/the-lifelong-learning-buffet-needs-nutritional-oversight/#comment-1384</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Ratcliffe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://johnnyrich.com/?p=1071#comment-1384</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is interesting stuff.  It&#039;s a curious thing, this gap left between the publication of the skills bill (with the promise of detailed rules on how the LLE will work) to the promise that a consultation is coming soon.

In my mind, I want to split the things that a provider might do and the regulations the DfE will need to write.  

We have some models of open qualification frameworks - I&#039;m thinking, say, of the Oxford Continuing Education Cert HE. This provides a framework for cognate work to be gathered in - the current rules need students to be aiming for a  qualification  and this gives a structure,  with what the the Americans would recognised as distribution/concentration rules.  As its all L4, it does need progression.  If students are going to accumulate 360  credits in the LLE, then any qualification offered is going to need to match the qualifications framework . A bachelors degree will need the required amount of L6 - otherwise a student with 360 credits at L4 is just going to get three CertHEs.
That&#039;s then where the government comes in.  Given the stuff about outcomes, does it really want to loan money to take three CertHEs?  Is it going to legislate for progression?  Will it remove the ELQ rule? Will it allow credit that isn&#039;t part of a degree? (that&#039;s the only bit that&#039;s currently in the Skills Bill). That would seem to mean only providers with DAP or programmes approved through validation/franchise can offer LLE approved courses.   While a provider might be able to &#039;control&#039; what a student studies - is the LLE going to allow concurrent study at different providers or on different courses?  Developing the ELQ argument, does the government mind if I take an Introduction to Data Analysis module twice? Can I take it at two different providers? And, because you can always push these things to absurdity - what it I took such a module 20 times sequentially and what it if took it 20 times at the same time? 

The LLE rules are going to be fascinating...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting stuff.  It&#8217;s a curious thing, this gap left between the publication of the skills bill (with the promise of detailed rules on how the LLE will work) to the promise that a consultation is coming soon.</p>
<p>In my mind, I want to split the things that a provider might do and the regulations the DfE will need to write.  </p>
<p>We have some models of open qualification frameworks &#8211; I&#8217;m thinking, say, of the Oxford Continuing Education Cert HE. This provides a framework for cognate work to be gathered in &#8211; the current rules need students to be aiming for a  qualification  and this gives a structure,  with what the the Americans would recognised as distribution/concentration rules.  As its all L4, it does need progression.  If students are going to accumulate 360  credits in the LLE, then any qualification offered is going to need to match the qualifications framework . A bachelors degree will need the required amount of L6 &#8211; otherwise a student with 360 credits at L4 is just going to get three CertHEs.<br />
That&#8217;s then where the government comes in.  Given the stuff about outcomes, does it really want to loan money to take three CertHEs?  Is it going to legislate for progression?  Will it remove the ELQ rule? Will it allow credit that isn&#8217;t part of a degree? (that&#8217;s the only bit that&#8217;s currently in the Skills Bill). That would seem to mean only providers with DAP or programmes approved through validation/franchise can offer LLE approved courses.   While a provider might be able to &#8216;control&#8217; what a student studies &#8211; is the LLE going to allow concurrent study at different providers or on different courses?  Developing the ELQ argument, does the government mind if I take an Introduction to Data Analysis module twice? Can I take it at two different providers? And, because you can always push these things to absurdity &#8211; what it I took such a module 20 times sequentially and what it if took it 20 times at the same time? </p>
<p>The LLE rules are going to be fascinating&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Why PQA should not be PDQ by University admissions: what&#8217;s the real problem? &#8211; Johnny Rich		</title>
		<link>https://johnnyrich.com/why-pqa-should-not-be-pdq/#comment-1381</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[University admissions: what&#8217;s the real problem? &#8211; Johnny Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2021 21:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyrich.com/?p=395#comment-1381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] by then, the students would have left. There are ways that PQA could be made to work (I&#8217;ve written on this blog about this), but, unsurprisingly, it&#8217;s neither as simple nor as attractive as Gavin [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] by then, the students would have left. There are ways that PQA could be made to work (I&#8217;ve written on this blog about this), but, unsurprisingly, it&#8217;s neither as simple nor as attractive as Gavin [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Should uni be an aspiration – or a &#8216;failsafe&#8217;? by Is it worth going to uni if you&#8217;re from a poor family? &#8211; Johnny Rich		</title>
		<link>https://johnnyrich.com/should-uni-be-an-aspiration-or-a-failsafe/#comment-866</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is it worth going to uni if you&#8217;re from a poor family? &#8211; Johnny Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyrich.com/?p=766#comment-866</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] in the first of two blogs (here&#8217;s the second), here&#8217;s how I responded to his initial [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] in the first of two blogs (here&#8217;s the second), here&#8217;s how I responded to his initial [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Is it worth going to uni if you&#8217;re from a poor family? by Should uni be an aspiration – or a &#8216;failsafe&#8217;? &#8211; Johnny Rich		</title>
		<link>https://johnnyrich.com/is-it-worth-going-to-uni-if-youre-from-a-poor-family/#comment-865</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Should uni be an aspiration – or a &#8216;failsafe&#8217;? &#8211; Johnny Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2019 23:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyrich.com/?p=754#comment-865</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] my last blog post, I mentioned that I&#8217;d got into a correspondence with teacher and author Matt Pinkett about [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] my last blog post, I mentioned that I&#8217;d got into a correspondence with teacher and author Matt Pinkett about [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Are eighteen-year olds adults? by Johnny Rich		</title>
		<link>https://johnnyrich.com/are-eighteen-year-olds-adults/#comment-711</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny Rich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnnyrich.com/?p=734#comment-711</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://johnnyrich.com/are-eighteen-year-olds-adults/#comment-710&quot;&gt;Nick von Behr&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, Nick. For all this who are interested in Nick and Caroline’s excellent article, here’s a link: https://wonkhe.com/blogs/bringing-parents-back-into-the-fees-conversation/ 
— Johnny]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://johnnyrich.com/are-eighteen-year-olds-adults/#comment-710">Nick von Behr</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, Nick. For all this who are interested in Nick and Caroline’s excellent article, here’s a link: <a href="https://wonkhe.com/blogs/bringing-parents-back-into-the-fees-conversation/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://wonkhe.com/blogs/bringing-parents-back-into-the-fees-conversation/</a><br />
— Johnny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
